Sunday, May 18, 2014

N162HG 1.6 Bob

I had an email conversation with Bob where I asked for more "checkride rules" lessons -- talking between maneuvers but letting me dig myself in ;) so long as we remain safe. He was cool with that, which is great! I then came up with a list of exercises that I believed would help me gain more basic skills in looking out the window rather than fixating on the wibbly wobbly instruments in front of me. I made a "kneeboard format" list of the exercises, reproduced below:

Level cruise
90 kias, 2350 rpm
Straight & level
level cruise
- altitude
Cruise descent
level cruise
↓ pwr
- 90 kias, heading
anticipate, ↑ pwr, level
Max climb
level cruise
↑ pwr to max
Vy = 62 kias
- 62 kias, heading
anticipate, accelerate, ↓ pwr, level
Cruise turn
level cruise
pick point abeam
- bank 30, altitude
anticipate, roll out
check altitude
Dogleg turn
cruise turn both ways
entire time
Practice final
carb heat
↓ spd to 100 / 85 / 70 kias flaps full
↓ spd to 55 kias
- 55 kias, hdg, pwr ↑/↓
Practice slip
practice final
- 55 kias, hdg, slip ←/→

Good habits pattern
carb heat
↓ spd 100 / 85 / 70 kias flaps full
↓ spd to 55 kias on final
on horizon 55 kias to threshold
CFI - “airspeed” / “check ASI”
To runway pattern
good habits pattern
forward/horizon
timing of base → final turn
sideslip to threshold
Landing pattern
to runway pattern
keep up speed near runway
cut to idle
gentle flare
maintain pressure

The idea was to "gamify" the training a little bit. Each step is a little game to see how well I can maintain the parameters of the maneuver by visual reference to the outside alone.

Result: I love this approach and think will keep trying to do these (and similar) exercises after solo!

We departed KPAO to the West and flew over the mountains towards the coast. The coast was covered in clouds, so we flew over them and out over the ocean, then turned back, and maneuvered around some more West of Hwy 280 and South of Palo Alto. We came back and did 1 touch and go and one full stop landing and called it a day.

It was very windy and bumpy, which was a good challenge for the air work but, in the landing pattern, was a total pain in the neck. Both my landings left very much to be desired. The first one, I ended up on my right wheel with a left crosswind on the right side of the runway, and my CFI took the airplane.

My biggest problem is probably the level-offs where I need to remember what to do. After the descent, just add power and let the plane come up to speed; the plane actually descends nicely with cruise trim when power is cut. After an ascent, I need to be more decisive yet gentle about the level off and remember to cut power as the plane accelerates. But overall, I'm getting the "feel" of a lot of maneuvers that I felt were in the bag with the C152 but are not so much so with the Flycatcher.

As Bob noted to me, I get stressed out once in the pattern and all the stuff I was able to do more or less okay (the stuff in the first "page" of the list above) flew out the window. I was --

  • Not managing my descent properly -- sort of put down flaps in one fell swoop rather than in a clean sequence;
  • Over-banking -- I tend to under-bank when I'm calm, but in the pattern, I whip the plane around in 40 degree banks;
  • Not handling the crosswind properly -- I still need to practice the crab / slip maneuver (start slipping about 1/4 mile out);
  • Overall doing a slapdash job in the flare.
I think I consider today to have been a good learning experience, though. I certainly have learned to look out the window more and trust that I can do a more or less okay job of maintaining my speed. I believe I would like to do the "second page" exercises next time. In particular, it may be good to actually try a "pattern" (with turns) at altitude, just to ingrain into my mind the process of slowing down and adding flaps.

Saturday, May 10, 2014

N162HG 1.5 Bob

Took off from KPAO around noon on a very busy, very windy, but beautifully clear day. Went to KLVK where we did a few touch and goes, then returned for a full stop at KPAO.

The Flycatcher is squirrely and hard to trim. And I'm still not used to the digital instrument. I think, for what it's worth, that the ASI is somewhat under-damped; it wobbles all over the place and is hard to keep straight. I also get confused about where we're at in altitude -- I see the 40, 60, 80, ... numbers swing by and I'm confused about whether I'm going towards or away from my target altitude. ;)

My landings were not very good, I'm afraid. I was having trouble maintaining altitude in the pattern, and kept having trouble with directional control and flares. Overall, I felt very wobbly. Even though the plane itself is a total blast to fly!

The KLVK controllers always seem a bit unsure of things. This time, when we reported in, they told us to stay out of their airspace, so we circled around Lake de Valle for a while. Then they let us in, but kept asking us for our position over and over. It's not like we don't have a transponder, folks!

I loved flying but did not feel good about how my landings went. I think here is what I really need:

* Bob needs to stop correcting my actions / outcomes and instead correct my technique. Rather than saying "keep the nose down," he should be reminding me to keep my eyes on the horizon. Rather than telling me when to turn in the pattern, he should be reminding me to keep my eyes pointed forwards.

* I worry constantly about whether Bob is going to tell me what to do, because that makes me sort of dock myself a point in my mental "how Ihab is doing" chart. I sort of like it when an instructor just lets me do my thing then comments on the final result and how I got there.

* I would really like it if Bob were to say more nice things about when I do a good job. :)

Friday, April 25, 2014

N162HG 1.3 Dave

(This flight was actually yesterday.)

Because my medical might end up being a pain in the neck, I've decided to go for a Sport Pilot license in the interim. I chose Advantage Aviation at KPAO, and I'll be flying their C162 Skycatcher. I booked a flight with an experienced C162 CFI to try it out.

Generally a lovely little 'plane. Nice and new inside compared to the old C152 I was flying earlier. Ergonomics are pretty good and visibility is stupendous.

Ground handling was difficult since I'm not used to the differential braking / free castering nosewheel, but I got better at it as time went on. The key is to stay on the throttle.

The rudder has a very strong return spring. That's a bit counter-intuitive and is really my only complaint with the aircraft.

It's hard to get used to the digital instruments -- I need to get accustomed to seeing numbers and imagining overall ranges.

We went out over SLAC and did some air work, then returned for 5 landings. I tried some Dutch roll coordination exercises till I got sick to my stomach! :)

The plane is hard to trim in pitch -- partly due to the rather touchy electric trim.

In general, I think I did okay with the landings. Still tending to raise my nose when I'm not paying attention, and it's hard to maintain speed control on final with that trim and those digital numbers!

Friday, April 18, 2014

N94565 1.5 Carol

Trying a new instructor while Bob is on vacation.

Carol did not help with as much things -- drove me in the car to the aircraft, let me out to preflight, got in for the flight, then got out and got into the car, waited for me to secure the aircraft, and drove me back to the club. So I got the full experience of airplane preparation, pushing the plane back onto the blasted rubber pad that the right main gear has to sit on, and all that.

Carol is much more laid-back about procedures. Pre-landing checklist: you already have everything figured out; just apply carb heat. Carol also let me do my touch and goes myself: Flaps up, carb heat off, throttle full, and go. Not even a re-trimming, which surprised me, but then that was never an issue since I'm not really all that much out of trim when I land, and I watch my speed as I climb.

I called in "Student pilot" and did practically all my radio work. The pattern was pretty quiet. That helped quite a bit. A few times we took off expecting right pattern and were directed to turn left crosswind, which was interesting because the left pattern altitude is 200' higher (Carol quietly reminded me...).

We did -- oh -- 15 landings? After a few, Carol said, I'm just going to let you do the next circuit without saying a word. That was great!! I was able to "anticipate" things and be much calmer and feel much more in control. There was not a lot of critique of my landings so much as just general encouragement and pointing out the things I did wrong in the flare. The last landing, Carol said, "that was awesome!"

Carol is a rudder person. Use rudder with ailerons. Keep them linked in your mind!

Cross-wind takeoff: Ailerons full into the wind, then let out as you pick up speed, then when you take off, you slide a little and then you can level off and you'll be correctly crabbed. Also, look behind me at the runway to see how I'm lined up with the centerline.

One time, on short final, I let my speed drop way down! The stall horn squeaked and Carol said, "More power please!!" Very scary and I'm not going to ever let that happen again!

Tried to focus more on the sight picture and less on the ASI ... I need to practice that more and more still.

What I learned today: Basically to relax, and that I do well when I'm allowed to make my own mistakes (so long as they are not deadly).

Carol said I am "excited and conscientious" about flying!

Saturday, March 22, 2014

N94565 1.4 Bob

Closed pattern at KPAO, 9 landings. Rwy 13 active with light x-wind from the left. Very busy with trainee tower controller trying to keep everyone organized. Lots of radio chatter.

Getting noticeably better. I still do "wishful flying" -- keeping the nose pointed towards the runway as I get closer to it, which means I dive into the runway. Coming in high and fast a couple of times, but no serious under-speeds today. A couple of bounces where I pushed the nose down after flaring too early; I need to just keep the back pressure consistent, allow the plane to start sinking again, then continue the flare. A little better, but not much, at lining up with the runway, transitioning from crab to forward slip, and sliding left and right. CFI says I need to fly to the extended centerline and then stay there, rather than just wallowing left and right. CFI also taught me that, as I flare, the control forces will become less and I will need to control more with the position of the yoke rather than the force, until it's pretty much full back on touchdown.

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Please co-sponsor S 2103 / HR 3708 (General Aviation Pilot Protection Act)

Sen Barbara Boxer (CA)
Sen Dianne Feinstein (CA)
Rep Anna G. Eshoo (CA 18th District)

Dear representatives,

I am writing to you all to ask you to CO-SPONSOR S 2103 / HR 3708, the General Aviation Pilot Protection Act.

My letter to you is not a "form letter" from an advocacy organization; it is from the heart and applies to my own situation and that of my own local jurisdiction. Please read it with that in mind and please do consider carefully why I would like you to be a co-sponsor.

As you know, the Bills are a preliminary proposal to permit more of the General Aviation fleet to be available for operation with a driver's license medical, in place of the current FAA Class 3 Medical certificate.

SIGNIFICANCE TO AVIATION

In 2004, the FAA created the Sport Pilot rule allowing flight with a driver's license in certain small airplanes. We have a great record of safe flight since then. But for some reason, the definition of "small" did not include the most common, cheaply available airplanes in the fleet -- small Cessna and Piper airplanes -- and so people had to buy new airplanes or maintain their Medical.

Sport Pilot is also limited to 2 seat aircraft, which make it hard to take more than one family member. This makes aviation inaccessible for most folks with children.

THE MEDICAL PROBLEM

One might think this Bill's main effect is cost reduction to pilots. It's more than that.

The FAA's arcane medical requirements set up "traps" for otherwise healthy people that drive them away from aircraft in general, regardless of the cost. While the FAA testing may cost thousands of dollars, it also requires endless medical appointments and an endless fear that the certificate will be taken away for some minor issue.

The FAA is not "evil" -- they are simply trying to cover their bases in the legal way they believe they should. We the people must free them from this self-imposed deadlock. We the people are the only ones who can make the executive decisions on this matter.

Medical incapacitation is by no means the worst cause of accidents. By the FAA's own analysis --

https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=13672

medical incapacitation does not even show up as a cause. The main causes are "Loss of control inflight" and "Controlled flight into terrain" -- airmanship issues that can be better addressed by equipment and training.

One wonders how much public funds would be available to the FAA to combat the real aviation safety issues if the backlog of medical applications and rule-making were alleviated.

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT

The question remains -- why is this important anyway? And why now?

The US has been the leading light in worldwide aviation research and development. We have the best General Aviation infrastructure anywhere. And we are losing it quickly. The FAA's data on the number of certificated pilots --

shows 188,001 Private Pilot certificates in 2012, down from 241,045 in 2003. That's a big loss!

We must make general aviation in the US accessible and "friendly" (as distinct from merely "cheap") or we stand to lose it.

BUT CAN WE AFFORD IT?

A common argument is that aviation is a "luxury" -- we cannot afford it as a society. Sometimes that is phrased as an environmental concern, given that aircraft burn fossil fuels, and most small piston aircraft unfortunately continue to burn leaded gas.

There is plenty of money -- and there are plenty of resources -- available for recreation in this country. We purchase electronic devices, cars and food. When we participate in classically "green" sports, like surfing and kayaking, we often drive to our starting point and back. We should of course find better ways to become more conscientious consumers.

But -- none of this justifies singling out aviation as the "luxury".

Many of my friends at my local airport are common people who put into their airplane about the same amount of money as you'd spend on an average car. They are not all "rich" (though of course some are -- and these folks also drive fancy cars).

WE CANNOT AFFORD NOT TO AFFORD IT

But really, revitalizing our general aviation population is actually the best way we can improve it! Without continued investment and participation, we cannot expect better, more eco-friendly airplanes. We cannot expect quieter airplanes. These exist at the moment, but they are very expensive because the pilot population is so small. We must first get pilots into aviation, then start replacing the current fleet bit by bit. For an example of a fuel-efficient airplane, look to Pipistrel, who regularly win the NASA fuel efficiency competitions --

These aircraft are not affordable yet. But the reason a Toyota Prius is affordable is that it slowly grew to replace an existing, healthy fleet. Can we build the Toyota Prius of airplanes? I'm sure we can! But not if we scare people away from flying by waving a big Class 3 Medical stick at them!

CONFLATION WITH OTHER AVIATION ISSUES

The Airplane Owners' and Pilots' Association (AOPA) has clearly come down in favor of these Bills. I agree with them.

But please remember that we pilots do not necessarily agree with the AOPA on all issues; they do not necessarily speak for us all!

An example is the AOPA's position on Pres Obama's budget proposal that would impose a $100/flight user fee on jet (and other turbine) aircraft flights that use Federal air traffic control facilities. The AOPA would have us believe that this is the gateway to a set of user fees that would put an end to general aviation! Yet -- somehow -- I can't get myself to agree with that. Many of us in the aviation world would be happy with a reasonable set of fees, structured based on some rational scheme, on a sliding scale. In Canada, for example, the fees are $68 per year for small airplanes --

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/alaskan/flying_ak/canadaUserFees/

I don't think this is unreasonable, given the other costs of aviation. If that's what it takes to keep the government running -- well, we must all pitch in!

So please, do not conflate the medical certification Bill before you with other "pro-aviation" efforts. We aviators are a diverse bunch and each issue before you deserves to be considered separately.

PARTISAN EFFECTS

The AOPA -- and here I will use a link from the AOPA's website! -- maintains a list of co-sponsors of this Bill --

http://www.aopa.org/Advocacy/Legislative-Affairs/General-aviation-pilot-protection-act.aspx

and I count only two Democrats! Please, do step forward and tip the balance. The Tesla Motors of aviation will not happen if we lose our pilot population! The Toyota Prius of aircraft will not be built. Our children will not learn how to fly if general aviation in this country is dragged down by over-regulation!

MY PERSONAL SITUATION

I am a student pilot living in Palo Alto, CA, and flying out of Palo Alto Municipal Airport. I fly the second cheapest airplane in the entire field, N94565 --

http://richp.com/fly/aircraft/94565.html

which is a tiny airplane, and one of the most common in the world, but (once again...) is not eligible for Sport Pilots because of the way the rules were drawn up back in 2004. I hope to fly this and the 4-seat version (not much bigger...) for fun with my family. This is the fulfillment of a lifelong dream set back in the 1960s when I was a child in Egypt, dreaming of aviation.

I cannot start flying "solo" without a Class 3 FAA Medical. I am very healthy -- low heart rate, low blood pressure, exercising every day. There are a couple things I have that trip the FAA's "radar" and require extra certification. But here's the kicker --

Every doctor I go to, in my travails to assemble the necessary paperwork, starts by rolling their eyes and saying, yeah, I know how the FAA is! Every single doctor. One of them said, "Oh, this is a formality." Another one said something unprintable. But this has taken me months and months, and $1000 of extra unnecessary testing, and there's no end in sight.

I am obviously an aviation nut. But do you really believe someone who's not as nutty as I am would go through all this trouble? Cost or no cost, just the trouble and legwork and endless appointments and medical records!

If my own general practitioner, who knows me best of all, can look at me and say I'm safe, and roll their eyes at the FAA's crazy rules and paperwork, is this not a sorry waste of Federal funds?

THE FUTURE

Once again, I entreat you to CO-SPONSOR these Bills! They are the future of aviation in the United States.

Best regards,
Ihab A.B. Awad
Palo Alto, CA

Monday, March 17, 2014

N94565 1.3 Bob

Afternoon flight from KPAO to KHWD to do a bunch of touch and goes and flying down Rwy 28L to learn low-speed control. Flew back to KPAO and landed.

Today I learned about the "Coyote Hills" landmark.

Very windy (we started at 5:30pm or thereabouts) with strong gusts.

We flew down 28L a couple times in addition to the usual touch and goes. On the second go, I could sort of stay on the left side of the runway, then scoot over to the right side, but it was very dicey. I am not really confident with this, but I also can tell that getting more confident will make me better at landing.

I'm still being overwhelmed by the number of things I need to do. Getting better, but still missing things like carb heat sometimes. It's hard to do all the "checklist" items while also paying attention to stick and rudder flight.

CFI says I'm not behind the curve, which is good to know.

On my final landing at KPAO, I got too slow (CFI says I was below 55 knots) by not paying attention, and we had hardly any flare at all. Not good!

In general, a satisfyingly challenging lesson, but I think it would be nice to have more time "in the flare" ... I'm imagining going to (say) some salt flats somewhere with 30 miles of perfectly flat ground in every direction, and just flying around at zero feet and learning how to control the airplane.